“This latest episode has highlighted that the world has changed as has the role of other nonbank and the interconnectedness among all ,” Paulson said. “These changes require us all to think more broadly about the regulatory and supervisory framework that is consistent with the promotion and maintenance of financial stability,” he added.

In extraordinary actions aimed at preventing a meltdown of the U.S. financial system, the recently backed ’s takeover of and agreed to provide an important multibillion dollar financial lifeline for the deal. In addition, the Fed, in the broadest use of its lending authority since the 1930s, said it would let squeezed go directly to the Fed for emergency loans. That has long been a privilege just for .

Paulson said he “fully supported that action” but said it also raises important policy considerations about the oversight of .

The secretary said that ’ access to the Fed’s emergency lending “discount window” has traditionally been accompanied by regulatory oversight and supervision. “Certainly any regular access to the discount window should involve the same type of regulation and supervision,” Paulson said, in an apparent reference to the Fed’s temporary extension of this emergency lending to .

And he suggested that the Fed collect as much information as necessary on to “make informed lending decisions.” He said the Fed is currently working to do that. Paulson suggested the Fed, the and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission also continue to work to build a framework on this.

“The combination of these steps should provide the with a structure and the information that it would need to make backstop loans during periods of market instability to nonbanks,” Paulson said.

These steps, he said, “would enable the to protect its , and ultimately protect U.S. taxpayers,” he said.

Although he praised the Fed’s decision to temporarily provide an short-term loans to , Paulson said it would be “premature to jump to the conclusion that all or other potentially important financial firms in our system today should have permanent access to the Fed’s facility.”

At this time, the Fed’s action “should be viewed as a precedent only for unusual periods of turmoil,” Paulson said.

Fielding questions after his speech, Paulson said that “innovation always precedes regulation in our economy” and suggested that oversight needed to catch up.

Once again Paulson defended the government’s role in coming to the aid of - which has been criticized by some Democrats and others as akin to a federal bailout.

found itself facing bankruptcy,” Paulson said. “The acted promptly to resolve the situation and avoid a disorderly wind-down. It is the job of to come together to address times such as this; and we did so. Our focus was the stability and orderliness of our .”

Paulson said the administration will explore ways to help struggling homeowners at risk of losing their homes. But he was cool to some of the proposals put forth by Democrats on Capitol Hill, saying that “most are not yet ready for the starting gate.”

In addition, he rejected the need for a “systemwide solution” to deal with homeowners who have no equity in their home. That’s when one’s mortgage eclipses the value of their home.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke recently urged lenders to help distressed homeowners by lowering the amount of their loans. He offered this because so many homeowners have little or no equity in their homes, giving them little financial incentives to stay in them.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts